ESTATE AGENTS: HOW TO SECURE YOUR COMMISSION
Are you an agency trading through a company or close corporation (CC)? If so, this is for you. In the recent High Court (Full Bench) case of Erasmus N.O. and Another v Verna van Den Blink Properties CC (A270/2014)  ZAFSHC 198 a close corporation lost its commission because its Fidelity Fund Certificate (FFC) was only in the sole member’s name and no separate FFC had been issued to the CC.
Coming short – a CC without its own FFC
Protecting your commission
Don’t put your commission claims at risk. Obtain separate FFCs for your trading entity/ies as well as for all directors/members/principals and agents. The entity’s FFC is issued free of charge but you must display it “in a prominent position” on its premises.
Another risk – the “trading as” scenario
In another recent High Court case - Ustica 1153 CC t/a Cape Region Home Sales v Jordaan and Another (A158/2014)  ZAWCHC 87 a CC with a valid FFC had fulfilled its mandate to find a buyer for a property, but it did so not in the CC’s name but in its trading name. The seller refused to pay the agency’s commission, arguing that it had never given a mandate to the CC, which was neither mentioned nor named in either the agency’s documentation or on its website.
The Court, finding on the facts that the CC and its trading name were effectively one and the same, awarded the agency its R78k commission. But don’t risk having to go the litigation route - avoid uncertainty by disclosing both your legal entity’s name and its trading name/s on all documents, letterheads, website etc. Take full advice in any doubt.
Jack Crook, Director at DotNews is well known to law firms as the author of LawDotNews since 2005. Jack’s legal qualifications (LLB Lond and LLB Rhod) are supplemented by many years of practical experience in law, in marketing his own firm, and in helping other small and medium sized professional firms to prosper by using simple, low-cost, effective marketing strategies.