LODGEMENT OF RATES CLEARANCE CERTIFICATES AND WITHDRAWAL OF CHIEF REGISTRAR’S CIRCULAR NO. 5 OF 2014
1. PURPOSE OF THE CIRCULAR
1.1 Several municipalities that are issuing rates clearance certificates manually, are not currently in a position to issue certificates that comply with the format in Annexure A to Chief Registrar’s Circular 5 of 2014, or the format as prescribed in the Regulations to the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 2000 (Act 32 of 2000).
1.2 In order to accommodate the problems experienced by municipalities and to avoid the rejection of deeds country wide, Chief Registrar’s Circular 5 of 2014 is hereby withdrawn and substituted with this Circular.
3. ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED RATES CLEARANCE CERTIFICATES
3.1. Pending the amendment of Act 32 of 2000, municipalities will be required to ensure that as from 1 July 2014, all electronically issued certificates contain an advanced electronic signature as contemplated in the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 2002 (Act 25 of 2002).
3.2. In the interim, the Office of the Chief Registrar of Deeds, Department of Cooperative Governance, SALGA, and the LSSA, have agreed that a Registrar of Deeds may accept electronically issued rates clearance certificates, if such certificates embody the following certificate by the conveyancer:
“I …………………………. (full name and surname) hereby certify that this is a print-out of a data message in respect of the original clearance certificate electronically issued by the …………………………..municipality (insert name of municipality).”
3.3 The Office of the Chief Registrar of Deeds, Department of Cooperative Governance, SALGA, and the LSSA have also agreed that the prescribed form be amended to include the description of sectional title units / exclusive use areas / cession of real rights. A copy of the proposed amended certificate is attached as ‘Annexure A’ and must be followed in respect of electronically issued certificates. It must be noted that although Act 32 of 2000 does not allow for a deviation from the prescribed certificate unless the regulation is amended, this interim measure will ensure that the property market continues to function and that the transfer of sectional title units/exclusive use areas/real rights is not delayed until the amendment has been affected. However, a rates clearance certificate that follows the format as prescribed by the Regulations to Act 32 of 2000, and not that of Annexure A, must not be rejected.
4. MANUALLY ISSUED RATES CLEARANCE CERTIFICATES
4.1. The Office of the Chief Registrar of Deeds, Department of Cooperative Governance and SALGA, have come to an agreement that manually issued rates clearance certificates that do not comply to the prescribed form in the Regulations to Act 32 of 2000, or to Annexure A, may also be accepted for registration purposes.
4.2. A manually issued rates clearance must at least make reference to the following:
5. DATES RELATING TO AGREED PROCEDURES IN RESPECT OF ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED RATES CLEARANCE CERTIFICATES
All electronically issued clearance certificates, issued on or after 31 March 2014, must embody the certificate by the conveyancer as referred to in par. 3.2 supra.
All electronically issued clearance certificates, issued on or after 1 April 2014, must conform to the format as contained in Annexure A.
All electronically issued clearance certificates, issued on or after 1 July 2014, must contain an advanced electronic signature as contemplated in the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 2002 (Act No. 25 of 2002). However, should the certificate not contain the advanced electronic signature, it must embody the certificate by the conveyancer as referred to in par. 3.2 supra.
CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE Hi I lodged a transaction in the Vryburg Deeds Office which was rejected with a note regarding the clearance certificate issued by !KHEIS MUNICIPALITY only reflecting the date stamp with date thereon but not an expiry date. Is the 60 day period from date of issue not applicable at all. All these changes are really bringing about unnecessary delays in registering transactions and the sellers are absolutely mad about all these changes due to Municipalities being fraudelent.